Roulette Software Lab evaluates a claim by translating it into an observable result. “Easy to use” requires a usability protocol. “Predicts red” requires pre-registered predictions and unseen outcomes. “Improves bankroll management” requires a comparison with the same wagers and a fixed-stake baseline.
Strategy simulations
We specify wheel type, table rules, starting bankroll, unit size, stop conditions, table limits, session length, number of simulated sessions and randomisation method. We publish median outcomes alongside averages because a progression can produce a misleading mean. Where relevant we report maximum drawdown, risk of ruin, distribution percentiles and the proportion of profitable sessions.
Software reviews
Reviews separate documented features from marketing claims. Performance tests use data that was not used to configure the product wherever possible. We record failed predictions and interrupted sessions rather than selecting only successful examples. Products receive the opportunity to correct factual details, but they do not approve our conclusion.
Sources and calculations
Basic roulette probabilities are derived directly from the number of winning pockets divided by total pockets. Technical or regulatory statements link to primary documentation when available. Calculations and custom tools are checked with known examples before publication.
Commercial relationships
If a page contains an affiliate, advertising or commercial relationship, it should be disclosed on that page. Compensation must not determine rankings, test outcomes or factual conclusions.
Updates
We update an article when its factual substance changes, not merely to display a recent date. Readers can report errors at info@roulettesoftware.com.